Nasarawa panel adjourns abruptly after Al-Makura’s appearance
BY ABU IDRISU:
The impeachment panel probing allegations of corrupt practices against Nasarawa State Governor, Tanko Umaru Al-Makura, adjourned abruptly on Monday after the Governor appeared before it.
The sudden adjournment, the panel said, was to allow the House of Assembly, which levelled the allegations, to appear before it to prove those allegations.
Chairman of the seven-man tribunal, Yusuf Shehu Usman, said the adjournment was in the interest of fairness and justice.
Usman said the Assembly, which has already distanced itself from the activities of the panel, must prove the allegations against Al-Makura, who on Monday absolved himself of any wrongdoing.
Usman said the panel has made provisions for both the accused and the accuser to either appear in person or be represented.
“The Nasarawa State House of Assembly may adduce evidence to prove the allegations contained in the said notice of impeachment of the Governor of Nasarawa State, Umaru Tanko Al-Makura, dated 14th July 2014.
“Pursuant to the above, the Nasarawa State House of Assembly may call witnesses and tender such documents as they deem necessary to prove the allegations against the Governor and where the party fails or neglects without justifiable cause to appear before the panel, upon proof of service on such party, either personally or by substituted means (as the panel may have ordered in the course of the proceedings), the panel will not be hindered in the conduct of its proceedings.
“Where the House of Assembly fails or neglects to appear and lead evidence in proof of the allegations, the panel, upon proof of service, may dismiss the allegations.
“Also where the Governor fails or neglects to defend the allegations against him and if the panel is satisfied that he has been duly served either personally or by substituted means (as the panel may have ordered), the panel will proceed to consider the evidence led by the House of Assembly and make appropriate findings,” the chairman said.
But Al-Makura appeared at the public sitting of the panel personally on Monday.
Led by his lead counsel, Udechukwu Nnoruka Udechukwu (SAN), Al-Makura told the panel that he was not served the notice of impeachment personally, but that he decided to appear before the panel to clear himself of the allegations levelled against him by the House of Assembly.
Al-Makura presented a voluminous statement of defence to the panel.
Udechuku urged the tribunal to dismiss the notice of impeachment for want of proof.
He said the failure of the Assembly to appear before the panel was an evidence that it had no proof of the allegations.
The impeachment panel probing allegations of corrupt practices against Nasarawa State Governor, Tanko Umaru Al-Makura, adjourned abruptly on Monday after the Governor appeared before it.
The sudden adjournment, the panel said, was to allow the House of Assembly, which levelled the allegations, to appear before it to prove those allegations.
Chairman of the seven-man tribunal, Yusuf Shehu Usman, said the adjournment was in the interest of fairness and justice.
Usman said the Assembly, which has already distanced itself from the activities of the panel, must prove the allegations against Al-Makura, who on Monday absolved himself of any wrongdoing.
Usman said the panel has made provisions for both the accused and the accuser to either appear in person or be represented.
“The Nasarawa State House of Assembly may adduce evidence to prove the allegations contained in the said notice of impeachment of the Governor of Nasarawa State, Umaru Tanko Al-Makura, dated 14th July 2014.
“Pursuant to the above, the Nasarawa State House of Assembly may call witnesses and tender such documents as they deem necessary to prove the allegations against the Governor and where the party fails or neglects without justifiable cause to appear before the panel, upon proof of service on such party, either personally or by substituted means (as the panel may have ordered in the course of the proceedings), the panel will not be hindered in the conduct of its proceedings.
“Where the House of Assembly fails or neglects to appear and lead evidence in proof of the allegations, the panel, upon proof of service, may dismiss the allegations.
“Also where the Governor fails or neglects to defend the allegations against him and if the panel is satisfied that he has been duly served either personally or by substituted means (as the panel may have ordered), the panel will proceed to consider the evidence led by the House of Assembly and make appropriate findings,” the chairman said.
But Al-Makura appeared at the public sitting of the panel personally on Monday.
Led by his lead counsel, Udechukwu Nnoruka Udechukwu (SAN), Al-Makura told the panel that he was not served the notice of impeachment personally, but that he decided to appear before the panel to clear himself of the allegations levelled against him by the House of Assembly.
Al-Makura presented a voluminous statement of defence to the panel.
Udechuku urged the tribunal to dismiss the notice of impeachment for want of proof.
He said the failure of the Assembly to appear before the panel was an evidence that it had no proof of the allegations.
Post a Comment